|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari
End of Life
3260
   |
Posted - 2014.08.13 00:30:00 -
[1] - Quote
I smell an early run at CSM10.
That aside, nice read. Hope you keep it up.
Come Win At Eve - Join The Vendunari
. -á<- Argue this, not this ->-á( -í-¦ -£-û -í-¦) |
Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari
End of Life
3266
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 00:37:00 -
[2] - Quote
Xuixien wrote:CSM would be cool, but I'm terrible at EVE. :(
You'll be a shoe-in then.
Come Win At Eve - Join The Vendunari
. -á<- Argue this, not this ->-á( -í-¦ -£-û -í-¦) |
Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari
End of Life
3276
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 06:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
Ria Nieyli wrote:I don't get why people think there's anything wrong with mining. Do you mine? What are you basing your opinion on?
I don't think epeen has a problem with mining or miners, just the model of asteroid belts currently used in the game.
I'd almost go as far as to say epeen loves miners, but that is my own assumption based on reading his posts.
Come Win At Eve - Join The Vendunari
. -á<- Argue this, not this ->-á( -í-¦ -£-û -í-¦) |
Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari
End of Life
3282
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 07:50:00 -
[4] - Quote
Derrick Miles wrote:I'd like to see the act of mining itself changed to something that was a little more active on the part of the player...
Just put a Billboard in every asteroid belt and stream Netflix straight into that.
No one will be AFK.
Miners win. Code wins. win-win outcome.
We can all live happily ever after as a big family under the rainbow. Utopia.
Come Win At Eve - Join The Vendunari
. -á<- Argue this, not this ->-á( -í-¦ -£-û -í-¦) |
Scipio Artelius
The Vendunari
End of Life
3308
|
Posted - 2014.08.13 11:18:00 -
[5] - Quote
Tam Arai wrote:are you sure its safer in hisec?
Those basic numbers you posted I can't argue with.
However, to see if you believe hisec is more dangerous than low and null:
1. Do you think there are an equal number of retrievers in highsec and low/null combined?
2. Would you AFK mine in a retriever in low/null? Would you do it in highsec?
3. Would you autopilot your way through low/null in a retriever? Would you in highsec?
4. Would you sit comfortably in a belt and not d-scan in low/null? Would you ever do that in highsec?
5. Do you care if new neutrals appear in low/null? Do you pay close attention to that in highsec?
My own answers to that would be:
1. There are not equal numbers in highsec v low/null. There are many more retrievers in highsec, so more losses there anyway. Percentage wise, I don't know, but the raw numbers destroyed isn't a direct measure of relative danger. It's more likely a measure of relative population of retrievers.
2. Never would I AFK anything in low/null. I personally don't do it in highsec either, but it isn't dangerous to do so.
3. Autopiloting through low/null is a quick way to death. Not really a problem most of the time in highsec.
4. D-Scan is a vital tool in low/null. In many highsec systems it is almost irrelevant most of the time.
5. Changes in local are just as important as d-scan in low/null. In most highsec systems, it hardly even matters.
Highsec is on the whole, far safer than lowsec and nullsec.
People in low/null take much more care of their own safety compared to highsec, because they have to for the most part.
Come Win At Eve - Join The Vendunari
. -á<- Argue this, not this ->-á( -í-¦ -£-û -í-¦) |
|
|
| |
|